New York Personal Injury Lawyer Blog 24/7
In an action to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution, the plaintiff challenged an order from the Supreme Court that granted summary judgment to the defendants—the Incorporated Village of Lloyd Harbor, its police department, and two officers—dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint.
In New York, false arrest and malicious prosecution are legal claims that individuals can bring against law enforcement or other parties. False arrest occurs when someone is detained without legal justification. To prove false arrest, the plaintiff must show that they were intentionally confined without consent and that the confinement was not otherwise privileged. The key defense against a false arrest claim is the existence of probable cause, which justifies the arrest.
Malicious prosecution involves pursuing a legal action against someone without probable cause and with malice. For a malicious prosecution claim, the plaintiff must establish four elements: the initiation of a criminal proceeding by the defendant, the proceeding terminated in favor of the plaintiff, the absence of probable cause for the proceeding, and actual malice. Probable cause serves as a complete defense to both false arrest and malicious prosecution claims.
These legal protections are designed to prevent abuse of power and ensure that individuals’ rights are safeguarded. If you believe you have been falsely arrested or subjected to malicious prosecution, consulting with a knowledgeable attorney is essential to understand your rights and explore potential legal remedies.
Background Facts
The plaintiff initiated the lawsuit to recover damages for false arrest and malicious prosecution against the Village defendants and his estranged wife, Michelle Masciello. The dispute arose from an incident where the plaintiff was arrested based on a complaint by his wife, alleging harassment. The Village defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, while the plaintiff sought summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Issue
Whether the existence of probable cause for the plaintiff’s arrest provided a complete defense to the claims of false arrest and malicious prosecution.
Holding
The court held that the existence of probable cause to charge the plaintiff with harassment in the second degree, based on the sworn statement of his wife, constituted a complete defense to the claims of false arrest and malicious prosecution. The Supreme Court thus awarded summary judgment to the Village defendants, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint against them.
Rationale
The court’s decision hinged on the principle that probable cause serves as a complete defense to false arrest and malicious prosecution claims. Probable cause requires information sufficient to support a reasonable belief that an offense has been committed. In this case, the sworn statement from the plaintiff’s wife accusing him of harassment was deemed legally sufficient to provide the police with probable cause for his arrest. Once probable cause is established for the arrest, it justifies the subsequent criminal proceedings and negates the elements necessary for a malicious prosecution claim.
The court cited several precedents, including Gisondi v. Town of Harrison and Reape v. City of New York, to reinforce that information from an identified citizen accusing another individual of a specific crime typically provides probable cause. Furthermore, the court noted that the existence of probable cause for the arrest negates the essential element of malice required for a malicious prosecution claim. The plaintiff’s contention that there was no probable cause was dismissed based on the consistent legal standard that probable cause for arrest justifies the ensuing criminal proceedings.
Conclusion
If you or a loved one has experienced false arrest or malicious prosecution, it is important to seek legal advice. An experienced New York police brutality lawyer can help you understand your rights and options. They can guide you through the legal process and work to ensure that justice is served. Contact Stephen Bilkis & Associates today to discuss your case.